Factoid of the Day: I've never paid for food from the MIT Student Center.
(Secondary factoid: The primary factoid does not indicate that I have ever shoplifted food (foodlifted?) from the Student Center. Just so you know. By “you”, I especially mean “employees and proprietors of the MIT Student Center who happen to read this blog and remember that one time when I wrote about taking too many condiment packets from Cafe Four.”)
Irrelevant confessions aside, I recently verified that the MITblogs readership consists of at least 40% actual humans, leaving an estimated 58% for spambots and 2% for MIT faculty members*.
*Disclaimer: this statistical breakdown of my blog audience is not verified by real statistics. It does, however, accurately reflect the views of the author.
Much to my disappointment, nary a single spambot showed up to the CPW Meet the Bloggers night last Friday, despite the fact that spambots are among my most adoring and persistent fans (why else would they offer me such irresistible deals on authentic Rolexes?). My heart sank when I realized that I wouldn't have the opportunity to purchase cheap pharmaceuticals and improve my credit rating at the same time.
Well, I eventually decided to settle for the spamless company of the MITblogs readership who would hardly be deterred by daunting obstacles like CAPTCHAs and hyperlink filters. Take a close look at this picture, and there's a good chance that you'll find yourself*:
*This sentence is to be interpreted literally in the context of “there's so many blog readers in this picture that the probability of your inclusion is greatly nonzero,” not in the hipster-artistic sense of “look deeply into the soul of this photograph and you will discover who you truly are.” I may be convolutedly metaphorical at times, but I'm not convolutedly weird. Just so you know.
Concurrently present in the room was a group of strangers who looked eerily familiar. All throughout the night I kept thinking, I'd recognize these people if only I could see them with less pixels (50 x 50, perhaps). Also, a multicolored banner above their heads reading “BLOGS: Our Daily Adventures” wouldn't hurt.
36 hours and roughly 3948394 mispronunciations of my name later, CPW strapped on its private jet pack, fired the engines, and gloatingly floated away from MIT, having inflicted a violent wrath of carnage on our anemic sleep schedules. Let it be said that English has not yet invented an idiom worthy of representing the monolithic effort that MIT squeezes out from its semester-weary muscles to give its prefrosh a weekend worth remembering. “The whole nine yards” doesn't come within a mile of apt description.
Thus, in this very paragraph beginning with this very “Thus”, I'm announcing the CPW Photography Contest. In light of my camera's unusual bout of laziness over CPW, I'm asking you, dear CPW-attending readers, to email me your favorite pictures by Sunday, Apr. 26. (CPW-related pictures, that is. I don't want a photo of your dog wearing a Jedi costume.) Photos judged to best represent the rapturous vitality and/or suckiness (but hopefully not the latter) of the CPW experience will be posted on an upcoming blog entry, in which I will take credit for all your pictures and become rich and famous on Flickr*.
*Just kidding, of course. Everyone knows that nobody ever becomes rich on Flickr**.
**In all seriousness, I will give you full credit for your photos***.
***Let's see how many asterisked-footnotes I can post in one blog!****
****Experiment truncated in order to minimize the annoyance of the MIT Admissions staff.
Anyhow, before I decided to stop taking pictures for a semi-forever period of time, I took pictures on Thursday at a dinner with MIT's Undergraduate Women in Physics, of which I am delightedly a member and of which my next-door neighbor Natania is delightedly the current president. The guest of honor was Professor Nergis Mavalvala, whose field of research involves detection of gravitational waves and the concomitantly awesome-sounding phrase, “ripples in the spacetime fabric caused by the motion of compact, massive astrophysical objects.” Not to mention, Professor Nergis herself was incredibly friendly and sincere and honestly curious about my life as a non-compact, non-massive and non-astrophysical object. The faculty at MIT is approachable in general, but Prof. Nergis was like your favorite teacher in grade school always asked you about what you did over the summer and listened to you when you talked about your life. (Except my favorite teacher in grade school never worked on building a space-based gravitational-wave interferometer, as far as I could tell).
Moral of the story: Student groups like UWIP and SPS (Society of Physics Students) in your major are a fantastic way of getting to know faculty members outside of class while scoring free dinners at top-notch restaurants in Cambridge.
Speaking of which, I owe y'all a Sparknotes-style summary of the dinner with Prof. Mavalvala from a culinary perspective.
Setting: Upscale and lavishly overdecorated “international” tapas restaurant that claims on its menu to not be a “tapas restaurant.”
Characters: Myself, Professor Mavalvala, a handful of UWIP members, and practically every plate on the menu.
Exposition: Standard preliminary breadbasket, dressed with oil and olives, and a small plate of Algerian sfiriates (deep-fried Swiss cheese puffs with tomato-cumin and yogurt-cucumber sauces).
Plot highlights:
Russian mushroom-filled crepe pancakes, topped with sour cream and caviar.
Sizzling garlic shrimp.
Tuna tartare and avocado mousse cornets.
Simple-but-vivid seafood and coconut soup.
Fingerling potatoes with oysters, crème fraiche, salmon roe, and champagne sauce.
Denoument: French banana bread.
To reiterate, I've never paid for food from the MIT student center.
(In case you've forgotten already, send me your best CPW photos by Sunday for a chance to become not really famous.)
Comments (Closed after 30 days to reduce spam)
As good, and often new, food is listed very highly on my priority list for college and questions, it is a great relief to know that not paying for food is actually feasible.
Sadly however, I do not have any pictures to share with you. Good luck with those, if any, that you get though!
Posted by: Anna on April 20, 2009
Posted by: 0 on April 20, 2009
Posted by: 0 on April 20, 2009
Come to think of it, my own gustatory palette has been tremendously augmented since coming to college. Glad to hear you're excited about trying new foods. Perhaps I should start a legitimate-free-food@mit mailing list for notices about student organizations that are having uber-classy free dinners (there's already a free-food mailing list, but half of the postings are along the lines of, "half a sandwich left in Stata, come and get it in the next 10 minutes").
Posted by: Yan on April 20, 2009
A new interesting food mailing list would be a good idea. But then again, the more people that know about the dinners, the more crowded they become.
I haven't visited yet but I'm hoping to be able to come up to MA this summer or fall. Is there going to be anyone, student or teacher, on campus then? Thanks
Posted by: Anna on April 20, 2009
Sure, campus tours run throughout the summer. I'm here over the summer, as well as quite a few other students. If you come after August 29th or so, there will also be classes in session.
Posted by: Yan on April 20, 2009
Posted by: Bridger '13 on April 20, 2009
Posted by: Tommy '13 on April 21, 2009
For food the correct usage is palate not palette. Anyone still believe in the preservation of the correct usage of words, rather than labyrinthine circumlocutions?
Posted by: Quilty on April 21, 2009
Also you asked for it: http://www.costumedogs.com/archives/jedi-master-pug
Posted by: hcs on April 21, 2009
I'm hungry; I hate you.
Regards,
Oasis
Posted by: Oasis '11 on April 21, 2009
Posted by: smiley on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Stephandlebars on April 21, 2009
I'm fully aware of the distinction and assure you that my usage was a deliberate avoidance of the expected phrase. Let's skip the literary analysis for now.
What you may construe as incorrect diction is just my way of adding drops of color to the graying world of Internet communication. I can't apologize for it.
Posted by: Yan on April 21, 2009
Posted by: 0 on April 21, 2009
Lulu and Cristen- EC
Kim and Yan- Random
Laura, Jess, Snively, Shannon- BC
Keri- SH
Chris- iHouse
Paul- Skullhouse
Ahmed- Next
Chrism- Simmons
Apologies if I'm mistaken.
Posted by: Yan on April 21, 2009
let's get out of here.
couple of announcement(s)
V Must act like an artIsT
marie curie is saying that.
i ate you, Bon appétit!
remembered,copy and pasted from SHReK
Posted by: comboy on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Someone on April 21, 2009
What is the limit for the amount of pictures you would care to receive from one person?
Posted by: Lin² on April 21, 2009
Please don't make me have to apply for another email address. Let's call 17 the max (although I'd prefer no more than 6 from a single person).
Posted by: Yan on April 21, 2009
read this page from where i can see yan looking down till 34OO
Posted by: comboy on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Sheila'13 on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Chris Praley on April 21, 2009
Btw, is it a usual occurrence to receive free food during events? I'm trying to come up with a plan to live off as little food money as possible.
Posted by: Lin² on April 21, 2009
THESE BLOGS ROCK! ... and are a good excuse to stay away from work..
Posted by: Kuljot '13 on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Narce on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Narce on April 21, 2009
See Narce's comment above
@ Chris:
Oddly, I was just thinking a few minutes ago that I have absolutely zero insecurity when it comes to nails.
@ Lin:
Yep. Anyone who plans an event is well aware that college students are perpetually hungry.
Speaking of which . . .
Posted by: Yan on April 21, 2009
That reminds me of how strangely you looked at me when I commented on how you were shorter than I expected ^_^" (worded just a little tiny bit less politely than that, but eh >.>)
Posted by: Narce on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Aditi on April 21, 2009
No worries. At least two people at Meet the Bloggers made the same comment. (As I mentioned earlier in Real Life, however, Paul B. gets it worse. It's become a running joke.)
@ Aditi:
I wholeheartedly agree, but I'm always slightly unsure about taking pictures of people and posting them on the blogs without their permission. Alas, I can only express her awesomeness in words.
Posted by: Yan on April 21, 2009
Posted by: Yan on April 21, 2009
> Wen do we get our IDS ??
> And umm.. How do we go about if we want to become bloggers in the coming years :p I love ye guys
Posted by: Anonymous on April 22, 2009
> Wen do we get our IDS ??
> And umm.. How do we go about if we want to become bloggers in the coming years :p I love ye guys
Posted by: Anonymous on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Jacobi on April 22, 2009
If I remember correctly, you'll get your Kerberos IDs when MIT sends out the Giant Envelope for students who decide to matriculate (sometime later in May, I think). So then you can indeed become anonymous@mit.edu (although I think that one is taken).
To become a blogger, you (1) do not ever listen to Ahmed and (2) send in an application when Matt posts the call for new bloggers (sometime in August). You can apply in any of your years at MIT.
@ Jacobi:
Thanks for asking! I prefer my name to be pronounced like yawn. Every other Yan that I've ever met uses the rhymes-with-can pronunciation though.
Posted by: Yan on April 22, 2009
Posted by: 1 on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Jacobi on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Narce on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Narce on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Anna on April 22, 2009
Are we required to get one recommendation from a math/science teacher and another from a humanities teacher?
If not, is it disadvantageous to have one from math and one from science?
Posted by: 0 on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Narce on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Niki on April 22, 2009
Then again, I base all my romanized asian dialects on Japanese -.-"
Posted by: Narce on April 22, 2009
Posted by: carlos on April 22, 2009
/logic.
Posted by: Yan on April 22, 2009
Posted by: Narce on April 23, 2009
Posted by: Jacobi on April 23, 2009
good pics
Posted by: Ashish on April 23, 2009
good pics
Posted by: Ashish on April 23, 2009
You... believe in calling things worthless? Isn't that a little rude? XP Or did I get the definition wrong?
Posted by: Narce on April 23, 2009
Posted by: Jacobi on April 24, 2009
And Jacobi, Harvard as a whole isn't worthless. Harvard's undergraduate program is.
Posted by: Narce on April 27, 2009
Comments have been closed.