I solemnly swear that I am about to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. (Woo, who's been watching too much Law and Order this summer?)
In my various unofficial capacities as a knower of MIT-related things, I have been asked many times how, precisely, one goes about getting into MIT. My first response is generally to spout one-liners about passion and hard work. I have been known to mention interviews and essays and extracurricular activities. This doesn't always seem to put the anxiety of prospective students to rest; knowing you're competing against 10,000 other people for spots in a class of 1000 tends to make people unsure of their own merits. But today, I realized that my own high school experience was so far removed from what most people judge to be MIT-worthy that it might be worth sharing.
First, I've always been psyched about brains. When I was in 8th grade, my mom brought home a copy of How the Mind Works by Steven Pinker, who used to be a professor here in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. I've also always been a voracious reader, so I snuck it out of her room and read it. And loved it. On the back cover, it said that Pinker was a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. I liked the way that sounded. It had a lot of syllables.
That's not why I applied.
Sure, it was part of it -- I knew MIT had a Brain and Cognitive Sciences department, and I knew that's what I wanted to major in, and, hey, if one of the professors in the department wrote awesome, popular books, it sounded like a good place to be.
But more importantly, my freshman year in high school I briefly dated a senior boy whose only ambition was to attend MIT and major in aero/astro. We broke up. He didn't get in. He was devastated.
You may see where this is going. Yes, I applied to MIT just to see if I could get in, and then make sure my ex-boyfriend knew all about it. I am a terrible person, blah blah.
Besides the terrible motivation for applying, I had a lot of other factors going against me. I was dead-set on attending Ohio State University, because I'm from the Columbus, Ohio, area and knew I could probably get a full ride. The best way to get a full ride at OSU is by being a National Merit scholar, so I knew I'd have to do really well on the PSAT. So -- and feel free to admire the logic here -- I took the SAT on October 14 my senior year as practice for the PSAT on October 17. No test prep, no studying vocab words. I didn't even really care what I got on the SAT, since OSU accepted the ACT, and I wasn't serious about applying to any east coast schools anyway. Good news: I aced the PSAT (80V, 74M, 80W) and got National Merit. Bad news: I got a 1430 on the SAT I.
NOTE:I do not personally think that a 1430 SAT I (which I guess would be, say, a 2150 or so now) is a bad score. But there are a lot of people who think that it is a bad score, and there are certainly a lot of people who think you can't get into MIT with a 1430/2150, especially if your math score is sub-700.
The one thing I always had going for me was that I was very involved in the performing arts at my high school. I made all 8 shows in the extremely competitive drama department, and even had lead roles in 6 of the 8. I made the elite show choir as a junior -- the only girl to make it her junior year. I was the captain of the 40-member color guard in a marching band which went to the Fiesta Bowl parade, Orange Bowl parade, and Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade. I did other stuff too: counseled 5th graders about drugs, NHS, quiz team, drama club, Latin club, all-Ohio choir, girls' state... you would sort of suspect that I was doing it for my resume, except that I obviously wasn't gunning for the Ivies. I just like(d) being insanely busy.
So during fall of my senior year, between state band competition, show week for the fall play, the Macy's parade trip, and Christmas shows for the show choir, I never got around to scheduling an interview with my EC. I didn't really worry about it. I was going to OSU on a full scholarship.
I should also mention that my school (which was a decent suburban public high school -- not awesome, not terrible) had weighted grades. Band and choir were held during the day, so I got band and choir grades, which were obviously As. I had also taken regular geometry and algebra II, then switched to honors for precalculus and calculus. So even though I had almost straight As, I was ranked 11 in a class of 530 because some other kids had figured out that if they only took honors classes and had 4 or 5 study halls a day, they could get straight As and be at the top of the class. I didn't really worry about it. I was going to OSU on a full scholarship with a stipend! Woo!
My high school offered 8 AP classes, and I took 3 (Government, English, and US History). Although AP Chemistry, AP Biology, and AP Physics were offered, I didn't take them (physics and chemistry because I hated them; biology because there was a conflict with show choir. To my credit, I did cry.) I did take all the honors science courses offered (biology B, genetics, and meteorology/oceanography), except physics. I hate(d) physics.
I have to admit that, looking back on this sorry history, it seems extremely unlikely that I was admitted into the class of 2006. You may also think that it seems extremely unlikely that I attended MIT, since I seemed so set on my scholarship and stipend at OSU... my friend Akhil (who has the distinction of being the smartest person from my high school ever to attend MIT -- there have only ever been two people from my high school ever admitted here!) claims that I never really wanted to go to OSU, I was just telling myself that. Maybe he's right. (He usually is.)
Anyway. I hope this story has been at least somewhat informative... anecdotal evidence has its limitations, but clearly it is possible to get into MIT without being a super-genius, or slave to schoolwork, or world-renowned master of something frighteningly difficult. (Although I suppose that helps.) Real people get into MIT. Real people even go here.
Comments (Closed after 30 days to reduce spam)
Posted by: fajrul on July 16, 2005
Posted by: Justin M on July 16, 2005
Posted by: Laura on July 16, 2005
Posted by: Laila Shabir on July 16, 2005
Posted by: Laila Shabir on July 16, 2005
Posted by: Jessie on July 17, 2005
Posted by: Alice on July 17, 2005
Posted by: Katharine Chu on July 19, 2005
Posted by: None on July 20, 2005
Posted by: David Justiniano on July 20, 2005
Posted by: Shalewa Odusanya on July 24, 2005
Posted by: Alexis Odusanya on July 24, 2005
Posted by: Omar E. Fernandez on July 31, 2005
i read you works,really good .i want to make a friend to you ,ok?
Posted by: heeroyuy on August 5, 2005
Your story was quite interesting. As someone else put it, it's quite nice to see real people get in.
Then again, I'm not exactly real. I don't know how much this will help me. Happy hunting anyhow.
Posted by: Laura Yue Bai on August 30, 2005
It doesn't help either when nobody from my school has ever gotten into (or applied) to MIT, so nobody can really give me any local advice. I hope the interview puts me at greater ease. Perhaps a dozen or less of a class of 350 go out of state for college, so I don't have a whole lot of encouragement from staff here besides the initial "gee whiz" type of comment.
It's hard to be isolated, but somehow i'll push through. Don't mind my ranting..
*goes back to making kanji cards.. have to learn 60-100 kanji by wednesday*
Posted by: Brian Burg on September 2, 2005
Posted by: vivek on September 4, 2005
Posted by: Kaylie Kempsell on September 19, 2005
Posted by: Michael on September 30, 2005
Posted by: Yasha on October 26, 2005
Posted by: bittered on November 28, 2005
The SAT is a worthless test. How one comes to a conclusion is far more important than the conclusion; the path gives the destination validity. The SAT completely ignores that philosophy, and reality, completely; the entire thing is crap, and it should not be feared.
Take, for example, the SAT writing section. I'm probably going to spend more than 20 minutes writing this response--and it is typed--how can they expect someone to write a structured essay in 20 minutes on a topic they've been given no time to even think about? The only ability the SAT writing tests analyze is the ability to bullshit, and that will never replace solid ideas and decent planning. I would like to know if those ignorant fascists at the College Board have written a college level essay in the last 10 years and even remember how to do it or how long it took them.
Then there's the SAT verbal section. Of course, being able to read is important but, once again, is being able to read FASSSSSSST important? I can read something I'm interested in and comprehend it well, and I can scan something that only slightly grabs my interest, but I can't stand the boring tangents that the test succumbs to. In addition, what if someone is lucky enough to have prior knowledge on one of the presented stories?
The math section seems the least likely to be biased in anyway or have any flaws. After all, it's not subjective, there is one numeric answer, and mathematics is pleasantly bland enough to be universal. However, to cite an anecdote, mathematics is not just about one numeric answer. During my first semester of Calculus, I spent about ten minutes solving a series problem the "brute force" way. In the midst of my solution, I forgot to distribute a negative, which threw off my entire response. When grading the tests, I mentioned the error, and my professor laughed and said to take off a point. Now, if this had been the SAT, I would have lost all credit for my answer, despite that I know how to compute a series. In fact, on the report I eventually would recieve from the College Board, it would says that I couldn't do whatever Geometry/Algebra I/Algebra II despite that I may have made a simple arithmetic error.
Because of one of those, a little swap of numbers, I came steaming out of the SAT II. Looking back at the problem, I had made a computational error--swapped a number from an earlier step with the one I was working on, probably due to moderate dyslexia, from which I suffer. Nevertheless, the question was geometry related, and now the SAT II Math Level 1 claims that I am not capable of manipulating trigonometric functions.
As fast as my world flies by, it takes sixty minutes for my heart to pulse. How am I supposed to demonstrate that I am, in fact, good at math in that time?
The SAT is worthless. It's a shame that we have to worry about our SAT scores, but don't ever take them personally. For your worth as a human being, as someone awesome, it doesn't make a difference. You won't get anything because you have a good SAT score, you get things because you do things with the mind you have. Anyone who flaunts a score should be kicked in the balls and have their score branded onto their forehead; they deserve the pain and the ridicule.
Breathe, think, listen. Respond, always respond. Never shut up.
Posted by: Dan Simonson, Emperor of the Moon, KSC on March 6, 2006
Posted by: Dan Simonson, Emperor of the Moon, KSC on March 6, 2006
Do B+'s hurt bad? My school usually sends 7-10 kids to MIT every year. I love my new school, but sometimes I think if I stayed at my old school I could have nailed straight A's and became valedictorian(we don't have rank here).
Posted by: Sagar on April 5, 2006
-Allie
Posted by: Allie on April 9, 2006
Waiting for your earlier reply.
Posted by: Ashreen Bumra on April 11, 2006
Posted by: William on April 17, 2006
Posted by: Kyle on April 24, 2006
Posted by: Johnston on May 16, 2006
Posted by: Ayush Gupta on May 17, 2006
Posted by: Omar '10 on May 20, 2006
however, i will try my best =)
ur blog gives me a pleasant feeling, i like it
Posted by: HenizeMeteor on May 25, 2006
i am jst 14 and have a couple of years ahead of me be4 applying but hey its always better to start learning bout the place early ..
anyways i have always wanted to learn biochemistry at MIT .. but i feel that i am way to average if you know what i mean ..
i am canadian but i live in the united arab emirates decreasing my chances of getting in
my grades are high but so are 10s of thousands of others.. i participate in shows and plays and teach my class sometimes too
do you think i can ever get into MIT with such an average lifestyle?!
Posted by: lama on May 25, 2006
Posted by: sukanya on May 27, 2006
I actually haven't even finished reading the blog yet, but I read the part about being from Ohio. I happen to reside in Lancaster. Well, between Lancaster and Canal. So to return to my previous point:
WHOOOOO!! GO BUCKS!
Posted by: Trevor on September 15, 2006
Anyway, I see now that you're actually from Pickerington. You say Columbus since many ppl wouldn't know the first idea as to where Pickerington is. Funny, think how it feels to be from Carroll.
I go to BC, and decided to mention it because it gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling that someone within the small area I know is actually going to MIT. Of course, Pick-town's still got its goods and its bads. I'm still not sure as to why the girls my class have a habit of dating guys from Pick-town. Big, strong football players usually... weird.
But BC is still as crappy as it ever was.
So, I'm just thanking for the post (kind of reassuring) and saying hi from back home.
HI!
Posted by: Trevor on September 15, 2006
Comments have been closed.