Once again, the New York Times has written about gifted education, this time a long and insightful article in the Sunday Magazine. Take some time and read it, you won't regret it:
I'm glad the Times has seen fit to devote more inches to the topic of gifted education. I'm also glad that some terrific organizations, like the Davidson Institute for Talent Development and the Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth (CTY). I'm glad to see one of my favorite teachers from my undergrad days at MIT, Jeanne Bamberger, mentioned. And I'm glad it was the fourth most emailed story of the day -- maybe people really do care about education and the future of this country.
Of course, I have some minor and not-so-minor quibbles with the article, which I won't detail now. But overall, I thought the piece was thought-provoking and well researched article.
There was a nice section towards the end of the piece with some choice quotes:
[Longtime MIT Professor] Norbert Wiener, the founder of cybernetics and himself a prodigy who went to Tufts at 11 and Harvard at 15, wrote that prodigious children need to develop a "reasonably thick skin" - to feel they aren't demonized and will find a niche, but not to expect the world to supply a spotlight. [Psychologist Dean Keith Simonton] speaks of the importance of being able to be "on the failure track for a while, take time off, take a real risk." Creativity and innovation, he says he is convinced, depend on "exposure to the unusual, to the diverse, to heterogeneity," which inspires a "recognition that there are a lot of different ways of looking at different things." There are also all kinds of ways that this "awareness that there's more than one possible world" can dawn.
For those of you intrigued by the program highlighted in the story, you should go learn more about the Davidson Fellows. Deadlines for this year's honors start in early 2006.
And with the holiday season coming up, I should note that a home subscription to the New York Times makes for a great gift. Even in this Age of the Internet, I do enjoy reading the newspaper of record daily during my subway ride to MIT and during lunch. A few other print periodicals I might recommend include The Economist, The New Yorker, and Science. They can be a little pricey, but you really do get what you pay for.
My agenda for tomorrow: mostly reading more EA applications, followed by games at the house. Should be another good day.
Comments (Closed after 30 days to reduce spam)
Hello Matt,
Had it been last year, then I would have won the trophy for being the first to post the reply on your blog!
It feels glad to see that you are "glad" four times in one paragraph!
The $100 Laptop appears to be a great initiative! Hope that the aims set will be met early and earnestly.
So, what may be the next thing to fly out into the world?
A $ 100^2 AIRCRAFT !!!
`The Economist' is a very good magazine. `Science' is one of the undisputed leaders of science and technology publishing, alongwith Nature. I love Nature, because Science is not easy to obtain in the library where I frequent. And that's precisely why I visit other libraries.
Don't you think that the above mentioned publishing houses must give/sell/distribute reduced rate copies to students who may not be able to afford their costs, but are really interested in them?
Yours truly
SHABIN
Nov 21, 2oo5.
Posted by: SHABIN on November 21, 2005
Do you think that a $ 10,000 aircraft is feesible within the next 5 years?
If yes, what may be the innovations and changes in the current systems required to make it a reality?
If no, why?
POST YOUR ANSWERS BELOW.
Yours truly,
SHABIN
Nov 21, 2oo5.
Posted by: SHABIN on November 21, 2005
Posted by: Andy Toulouse on November 21, 2005
I know you said you would post an entry about the application reading soon, but I'd really like to know if you could take us (the prospective MIT students) *inside* the process...for instance, maybe chronicle the "life" of a single (anonymous) application, its journey from mailing room to individual readers to committee, etc. I'm just curious.
Thanks,
Rebecca
Posted by: 0 on November 21, 2005
To all: Now let's watch Mr. McGann get dozens of subscriptions of the New York Times to be delivered at the MIT office of Admissions! Also some scattered copies of The Economist and etc.
You know,... now that he's given us this great big hint and everything...
Posted by: Victoria Wong on November 21, 2005
finish high school 1998, helped run family's
international business 7 years, no college classes.
I know it says you are required to live on campus
in one of MIT's 11 residence halls, so prolly
discourages people who aren't normal undergrad age?
Posted by: Marybeth Lee on November 21, 2005
Posted by: Alissa on November 22, 2005
Well, in my opinion, the above quote will get into the list below, one day.
- "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895)
- "The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." (Western Union internal memo, 1876)
- "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." (Marshal Ferdinand Foch, French commander of Allied forces during the closing months of World War I, 1918)
- "The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" (David Sarnoff's associates, on investment in radio in the 1920's)
- "Professor Goddard does not know the relation between action and reaction and the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react. He seems to lack the basic knowledge ladled out daily in high schools." (New York Times editorial on Robert Goddard's revolutionary rocket work, 1921)
- "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" (Harry M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927)
- "The [flying] machine will eventually be fast; they will be used in sport, but they are not to be thought of as commercial carriers." (Octave Chanute, aviation pioneer, 1904)
- "Landing and moving around on the moon offer so many serious problems for human beings that it may take science another 200 years to lick them."(Science Digest, August, 1948.)
- "X rays are a hoax."
"Aircraft flight is impossible."
"Radio has no future." (Physicist and mathematician Lord Kelvin (1824-1907))
- "The bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives." (Adm. William Leahy, U.S. Atomic Energy Project, 1945)
- "As far as sinking a ship with a bomb is concerned, you just can't do it." (Rear Adm. Clark Woodward, US Navy, 1939)
If the quote does not enter that list, then it may get into this shorter one, surely:
- "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." (Thomas Watson, Chairman, IBM, 1943)
- "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." (Popular Mechanics, 1949)
- "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home." (Ken Olsen, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977)
And the best of it all, the icing on the cake:
- "Everything that can be invented has been invented." (Charles H. Duell, commissioner, US Office of Patents, 1899)
But, I go with this one:
- "Aviation is proof that, given the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible." (Edward Rickenbacker (1890-1973) US war hero and airline executive)
And I go with it again, forever.
GIVEN THE WILL, WE HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ACHIEVE THE IMPOSSIBLE !
Forever,
SHABIN
Nov 22, 2oo5.
Posted by: SHABIN on November 22, 2005
Dear Andy Toulouse,
The above post is an unsupposedly intended serious shenanigan. So, take it seriously, but in the spirit of it.
Andy Toulouse, what do you think will be the innovations and changes needed to make an aircraft cheaper than a Ferrari or Maybach? Here I am not speaking of an UAV or an Airbus A-380, but an aircraft that may the size of a car or a bit bigger.
Already, there are many new additions coming into the Aeronautics field that gives a slight glimpse of the type of aircrafts that are to come in the future. For example, the amount of carbon fibre based materials being used in the Eurofighter Typhoon reduces it's weight to great extents than had the materials been conventional.
One very imortant aspect that may need addressing will be the Propulsion Systems. The newer system must be lighter and more fuel efficient. As far as the former is concerned, some indications in this direction are following in the form of Nested core engines. For the latter part, efficiency needs to be increased in the following areas of Propulsion systems:
- Cost of production
- Cost of operation
- Cost of maintainance
- Fuel efficiency
- Weight optimization
I agree that much things need to be done before a $10^2 aircraft can be made a reality. But then again:
- "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." (Popular Mechanics, 1949)
And now, look at the $100 Laptop, also.
Yours truly,
SHABIN
Nov 22, 2oo5.
Posted by: SHABIN on November 22, 2005
I had my interview on October 22, but it still is not processed yet. My interviewer told me that he had until November 15 to file EA interviews. The Conducted Interview form mentions that two weeks after the interview is the recommened time to fill it out, but should it be two weeks from when the report was submitted? In your post you mention how an I is the best and I would like to have my interview available rather than a C since it went well and lasted two hours. However, I really do not want a N on my E-3 card since I did actually have an interview. So, if I file the conducted interview form, can my interview still become processed at a later date or does the C remain permanent?
To make the situation more complicated, why is a W better than a C? I was told that that I could get my interview waived, so if I have to settle for a C instead of an I on my E-3 card would it be better to get a W and if so how?
Also would having my interview with someone other than my EC cause a processing delay?
I would view this as the ultimate interview question. I find it interesting that I could possibly end up with any one of the four interview results.
Posted by: Justin on November 23, 2005
Anyway, I also wanted to point out the Rochester Institute of Technology (I believe) has their MyRIT portal, which I thought was very funny XD
Posted by: zoogies on November 23, 2005
I have an urgent problem. I have just tried to contact my EC here in Oslo, Norway, but recieved an email saying that my email could not be delivered to my EC's address, as his username was unknown. I then contacted to company in which he is 'employed', only to find that the receptionist does not even know of my EC.
Therefore, I would like to ask you what you think my next course of action should be?
Kind Regards
Michael B. Berthelsen
Posted by: 0 on November 24, 2005
Posted by: Eric Johnson on November 24, 2005
Posted by: Sam on November 24, 2005
~_~ ThE DrEaMy RoCkEr *_*
Posted by: Palash Agarwal on November 24, 2005
Posted by: Palash Agarwal on November 24, 2005
"[Longtime MIT Professor] Norbert Wiener, the founder of cybernetics and himself a prodigy who went to Tufts at 11 and Harvard at 15"
Eleven years old and already in college. It's amusing that after being a student at that OTHER school, he is now an MIT professor.
I found a Wikipedia article on Wiener (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_Wiener). In the article was great anecdote:
"Wiener was quite short, five foot even, in fact. He was also given to the kind of absent-mindedness for which academics are known. MIT corridors have, or at least used to have, wainscoting, that is, a strip of wood with a moulded groove in it running along a wall about three and a half feet off the ground. The nominal purpose of this is to prevent chair backs from scratching the paint on walls and to provide a boundary between the darker shade which the lower part of walls are usually painted and the lighter shade above. It was Wiener's custom to stick his finger in this groove, close his eyes, lower his head in thought and walk down a corridor, guided by the wainscoting. Professors were told to close their classroom doors or Wiener would be apt to follow the corridor wainscoting to the door jamb of the classroom and pick up the trail of the wainscoting on the inside of the classroom, following it around the room until it led him back to the corridor."
Quote:
"A few other print periodicals I might recommend include The Economist, The New Yorker, and Science."
Yes! I read both the Economist and Science, and they are both really, really good. I've also found that Time magazine makes for good light reading, and can be fairly informative (though they do have a tendency to dumb down articles regarding science).
Posted by: Zack Yang on November 24, 2005
Posted by: Rhiannon Carr on November 27, 2005
Posted by: renuka on November 28, 2005
Add a comment