One of my five classes this term is sponsored by RATP, the metropolitan transit authority of Paris. It's a graduate design workshop in the School of Architecture and Planning's Mobile Experience lab, and I might turn it into a for-credit UROP as well.

RATP has asked us to consider new uses and features for the Paris metro (subway) system -- ways to make it not just a simple means of transport, but an integral part of community and leisure. Everything's becoming automated -- ticket sales, even the operation of the trains -- and new space is opening up where those tasks were previously performed manually. What can be done with a ticket booth now that people buy from machines? Who is taking the metro, what kinds of things appeal to them, and how do they interact with their fellow passengers and the surroundings? Plus, once staff members are no longer needed for newly automated tasks, how can they be put to use in new and innovative ways?

Yeah, that was an intro slide I put together...
Anyway, once we identify potential new services and prepare our recommendations, the authority's research and development staff will be hosting us in Paris. The trip will allow us to validate what we've found and also do some on-site research, exploring the metro and its integration into Parisian life.
RATP is known for experimenting with new and innovative concepts, including a "faster" moving sidewalk (no joke...):

This thing is called the TRR, or trottoir roulant rapide, and is being tested at Paris' Gare Montparnasse as a possible time saver in that long tunnel. Apparently you stand on a slower portion for a few seconds, keep your feet straight, and it glides you onto the fast section so you don't fall. Wikipedia says, "At first it operated at 12km/h but too many people were falling over so the speed was reduced to 9km/h. It has been estimated that commuters using a walkway such as this twice a day would save 11.5 hours a year."
11.5 hours a year saved? But what happens when you get to the end of the trottoir and have to wait a minute for your train, or for escalator congestion? Well, I'm sure they'll figure it out! (or maybe I should include that in my notes... hmm...)
Comments (Closed after 30 days to reduce spam)
I'm sure Paris adopted this years ago but Hong Kong was the first to introduce it.
Posted by: Ricky wat on February 25, 2007
Posted by: Sh1fty on February 25, 2007
Posted by: Anthony on February 25, 2007
Posted by: Sh1fty on February 25, 2007
Posted by: theresa on February 25, 2007
Cool class.
Posted by: AJ on February 25, 2007
because it would inform the user about trade fairs, shopping sales or any event relevant to them it would become 'an integral part of community and leisure'
Posted by: Aditya on February 25, 2007
[A nifty online translator might be useful. MIT students like puzzles, right? =D]
Posted by: F on February 25, 2007
Posted by: Anthony on February 25, 2007
Posted by: Karen on February 26, 2007
I love the London Underground it's definitely the best way to get round London.
Posted by: Chessy on February 26, 2007
Anthony- I can see two consequences to your proposal of having different cars for different commuters. The downside is the non-business people will have to suffer more congestion. The upside: the extra revenue gained from the 'business' cars will hopefully go into alleviaing the transportation costs of the non-business people.
Karen- Can you elaborate more on the MRT in Taipei?
As for me, where I live in the world, people look so frustrated and drained of energy when they board the trains after work. It may be lovely to have the trains play some soothing music or spray out mists of sweet perfume into the air. There are two problems though: firstly, music and scents are sometimes appreciated diiferently by different people; second, the extra costs will again be passed onto the commuters. Well, I guess there is nothing better than a personal ipod at the moment.
Posted by: Daisy on February 26, 2007
Posted by: Anthony on February 26, 2007
Daisy - the folks who don't pay for the better seating would likely resent the reduced capacity, it's true. Something to consider is the platform lengths and whether an extra car is an option...
Posted by: Anthony on February 26, 2007
Posted by: Sh1fty on February 26, 2007
seriously though, you know what would be useful for the train itself, if they said how many people were actually in each car at any given moment, or how many seats are available in each car - could see that being done with LED displays and some sort of sensor
idk just a thought, could save some claustrophobics
Posted by: Jon on February 26, 2007
Delhi Metro customers have the following choices for the ticket purchase.
Smart card: These cards are most convenient for the frequent commuters. Valid for one year, these travel cards are available in the denominations of Rs. 50, Rs. 100, Rs. 200 and Rs. 500. 10% bonus is given on each recharge or new card. A deposit of extra Rs.100 needs to be made before buying a new card.
Tourist card: These cards can be used for unlimited travel over short periods of time. There are two kinds of tourist cards - 1 day and the 3 day. Cost of 1-day card is Rs. 70 and 3-day card is Rs. 200.
Token: These tokens are valid only for a single journey on the day of purchase and the value depends on the destination. Fares are decided based on the destination station using the token table.
Blue and Red Tokens are for a single journey only, whereas Green Tokens are for those who need to change trains.
Posted by: Ashwani Gupta on February 27, 2007
Posted by: Ashwani Gupta on February 27, 2007
Posted by: bhushan on February 27, 2007
Then you have the other end of the rope, what if the "relaxing" cars are too full and the business cars can still fit more people bc it's down time and the business people are at work? (This seems unrealistic, but I think of every possibility there is.) The train should travel with the maximum amount of people it can fit, so then I guess it'd actually end up being more expensive to have the business cars empty. So I think the perfect thing would be to have all cars be the same, the way it is now, the only thing is that i'd have the internet and whatever else in every seat, and to use them you'd have to drop some coins/swipe a credit card to pay for it. Those who want to be alone and that would pay extra for the business car shouldn't even be taking the metro, because everybody knows it's hectic. They should be taking taxis!
Posted by: milena on February 27, 2007
Add a comment