+1 for MIT by Bryan

2 responses to “+1 for MIT”

1. thekeri says:

   August 8, 2006 at 2:39 am

   Woo hoo!

   Last year, I put more stock in the Washington Monthly’s rankings, mainly because they took the time to explain how they came up with them. U.S. News’ rankings, however, seem to put a lot of weight on some generally useless areas.

2. Colin says:

   August 9, 2006 at 1:33 am

   It’s tough coming up with criteria for these sorts of things, but based on MIT’s placement, I’d say the Washington Monthly does a much better job than U.S. News.