20210213, 15:54  #760 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
626_{10} Posts 
Ok, I'll take both bases.

20210213, 16:07  #761 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
29·139 Posts 
I also see that 496 still has quite a few odd parity sequences that haven't reached 140 digits. They don't show reservations and are on garambois' list.
Last fiddled with by EdH on 20210213 at 16:09 
20210213, 16:18  #762  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
3·227 Posts 
Quote:
Absolutely yes ! Perfect numbers play a key role in our project ! Quote:
This is really incredibly fantastic !!! If you really need more sequences, you can initialize bases 34 and 35 up to the minimum exponent 80 (or even 90). Because it is with these small bases that we are most likely to disprove the theory about cycles that we believe to be wrong exposed here : https://www.mersenneforum.org/showth...12&page=66#720. If you want to calculate these two new bases, let me know. I would then add them to the page during a future update, when all the sequences whose exponents have the same parity as the base will end with a prime number. So the work is less laborious for me ;). Another solution : you can reserve bases already initialized from the project page and not yet calculated "very far" : bases 439, 770, 1155. Or wait for tomorrow's update (February 14) to see other bases for which we can push the calculations further. 

20210213, 16:19  #763 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
1001110010_{2} Posts 
Base 496 Taken.
Last fiddled with by yoyo on 20210213 at 16:20 
20210213, 16:24  #764 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany
1162_{8} Posts 
And take them all, base 34, 35, 439, 770, 1155 and will see how much it will be.

20210213, 16:33  #765  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
1010101001_{2} Posts 
Quote:
Yes ! And I think we will also be forced to add exponents for base 28, up to 100 in a while, because it would be difficult to add exponents for larger perfect numbers, we would have too large integers too quickly ! 

20210213, 16:34  #766 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3,449 Posts 
I am starting the preliminary work on base 41 and base 43.

20210213, 16:44  #767  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
3·227 Posts 
Quote:
I think all of these bookings are going to represent a lot more than 200 sequences ! But a thousand times so much the better if yafu can do all this work !? Thank you very much ! 

20210213, 16:49  #768 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
3·227 Posts 

20210213, 23:16  #769 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
29×139 Posts 
I'm nearing completion of base 450 through i=50, but three exponents (47, 49, 50) are unfinished.
I'll start work on 578 (2*17^2) next. 
20210214, 00:48  #770 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
3×11×23 Posts 
I just completed 882 (2*21^2) up to 120 digits (882^40). All terminated with primes except with 882^29, which terminated with a cycle (6)
I'm also finished with 24^27, and I'm releasing everything on base 24 below and including that. If Karsten doesn't mind, I'd like to have a look at his page generation script. There are still some lingering HTML issues I want to take a crack at fixing. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Broken aliquot sequences  fivemack  FactorDB  46  20210221 10:46 
Broken aliquot sequences  schickel  FactorDB  18  20130612 16:09 
A new theorem about aliquot sequences  garambois  Aliquot Sequences  34  20120610 21:53 
poaching aliquot sequences...  Andi47  FactorDB  21  20111229 21:11 
New article on aliquot sequences  schickel  mersennewiki  0  20081230 07:07 