One year ago, in the mush of schoolless boredom known as Spring Break of junior year, I got into MIT. “Got into” is here used idiomatically in the superficial sense, bearing no deeper significance than that I could take a plane to 77 Massachusetts Avenue in August and call myself a student if I wanted to. (I am, of course, blatantly ignoring the huge mass of angst and pain known as Paying Tuition). My situation was thus: One year of high school stood between myself and a diploma. I wasn't accepted to any other colleges, probably because I hadn't applied to any other colleges. After about 5 picoseconds of staring at my acceptance letter from MIT, I became exceedingly convinced that graduating high school was just a formality, a trivial remnant of the antiquated American Dream that dominated social aspirations in the postwar decades of the previous century*. Plus, “high-school dropout” had a nice ring to it (and I would get loads of street cred too!).
*By the way, I copied and pasted part of this sentence out of a book report that I wrote about Death of a Salesman in 10th grade.
So I decided to cross “Finish high school” off my to-do list. Before taking a second look at the campus, before getting my financial aid package, before understanding the course requirements, before learning that the elevators in the Stata Center are only semi-functional, before hearing of Random Hall, even before talking to Donald Guy '12 (who, in all likelihood, helped convinced about 15% of our class to matriculate by various means of the Internet), I accepted my offer of admission. You already know the rest of this story, and some of you who are reading this will live it for yourselves in the next six months. I can hardly wait.
The punchline is that to call myself gratuitously lucky would be understating the absurdity of my uninformed, mostly blind, yet tremendously unregrettable decision. Every day, I wake up. To be more specific, every day I wake up and marvel at the sheer impossibility that I picked the right college without seriously looking at more than one college. Then I go back to sleep, because I probably went to bed at 3 AM the night before and can't believe that I just wasted 30 seconds thinking about how great my life was when I could have been sleeping.
The truth is that MIT isn't right for everyone. Some people wish they had picked the state school that offered them a full ride, a free car, and the right to name a state park after themselves. Some people wish they had picked Harvard. The latter usually soon regain their ability to make reasonable judgments, however.
So, whether or not you're considering MIT (if not, you might be on the wrong website), here's my advice: Look both ways before you cross the street from high school into The Vast Unknown. Forget the brand-name universities and try to imagine where you'll be happiest. Talk to actual students. Probe their insights of their learning environment. Ask them to share with you the aspects of college life that matter most to them (you might get a surprise). Ask them about their most shocking self-discoveries, their failures, their moments of unbearable misery and unforgettable joy. Ask yourself whether you want to live through the same experiences.
I'll start:
This past semester, I've finally started to understand MIT as an institute built on cooperative, immersive learning. Meaning that the curriculum is structured around a level of difficulty that requires you to reach out and work with your classmates, to stay up until the early hours of the morning discussing problem sets, correcting each other, plowing yourselves into deeper, subtler levels of comprehension that you certainly didn't see during lecture. The end effect is that the line between your classes and life beyond classes becomes progressively blurrier until you're instinctively radiating and absorbing information from those around you during all waking hours. This is unbelievably uplifting to your ability to make interesting dinner conversation at family gatherings.
Snapshot: Last night, on the inaugural evening of Spring Break, I forgot to come home after lab. I walked upstairs to Lulu's office hours, arbitrarily, because I remembered That One Blog Post where she wrote about how nobody went to her office hours and how she sat around and ate a sandwich instead. We worked through half a problem, maybe, and spent a nebulously indefinite haze of time sitting there, in an empty office, in a deserted hallway, right above MIT's famously (un)Infinite Corridor, chatting loosely about physics. Lately, I've been realizing that trying to grasp threads of understanding from the fabric of the universe is like pretending to be a salmon. You swim upstream, bluntly against the direction in which the water (the physical metaphor for your intuition) pushes you, but you struggle harder than the actual salmon because you have no instinctive knowledge of how to subvert the current. You are disoriented, weightless and uprooted, despite the fact that you have read books and articles by talented salmon like Stephen Hawking and Alan Guth.
Anyway, it was 9 pm after a while. Weird how that happens.
On a tangential note, I recently discovered with much confusion and psychological turmoil that I prefer college-ruled paper to wide-ruled. Walking into Walgreen's on an innocent sunny afternoon and feeling compulsively drawn toward what I previously considered a waste of trees, I was overcome with self-denial and forced myself to pick up a stack of wide-ruled instead. Halfway to the cash register, I couldn't bear it any longer and threw the wide-ruled paper into the candy aisle with much angst and internal dissonance. Mournfully, I lost the identity that I built for myself on the day in 4th grade when I decided that college ruled paper was for uncool kids who didn't own any good Pokemon cards.
Perhaps it's a good thing. Edward '12 recently borrowed my E&M lecture notes, freshly scripted on college-ruled paper, and told me that they were neat. This has never happened to me before in real life. It may have happened once during a particularly boring dream, but I can't remember.
Anyway, the Blog Police are telling me that I should quit trying to become a guest speaker on Oprah and post a picture already.
Lobby 10 at noon, bird's-eye view from the 2nd floor. If you show up early to lecture in room 10-250, you can lean against the railing and think about how this is one of the few spots along the Infinite Corridor where your cell phone gets a signal. (T-Mobile users, I'm writing this for you.)

There's something distinctly fractal-like about the architecture of Lobby 10. Douglas Hofstadter, if you're reading this blog, I give you full rights to use this picture in your next book.

I call this one “Vertigo,” or “Experimental Byproducts of Camera Rotation.”

I encourage you to go forth and reevaluate your life now.
Comments (Closed after 30 days to reduce spam)
Posted by: 0 on March 21, 2009
Posted by: 0 on March 21, 2009
Posted by: Yan on March 21, 2009
Posted by: Janille '13 on March 21, 2009
Anyway, as a high school sophomore, I still have plenty of time to seek out colleges, but MIT is definitely numba' 1 on my list, but, as you mentioned above, I really know nothing about it. And it's terribly expensive. Who knows where I'll be graduation from in 2015.
Posted by: Chris Praley on March 21, 2009
Posted by: Lin² '13 on March 21, 2009
another thing: i thought people at MIT didn't know how to write well... you have proven me wrong.
Posted by: prospie on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Jamo on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Bridger '13 on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Shosh '13 on March 22, 2009
Thanks!
Posted by: Emily '13? on March 22, 2009
I love your metaphorical writing style; it is so nice to read and be able to picture immersing myself into what you are saying! I feel like I fit right in with the MIT folks
Thanks!
p.s. I prefer college ruled paper, too! I agree with Sosh '13; the slacker students use wide-ruled.
Posted by: Next Year! =) '14? on March 22, 2009
Thanks for the advice Yan. I've looked at other schools, but none seem right for me. MIT is perfect. I can't wait to see you there at CPW and next year!
Btw, do you get any 3G Tmobile service there?
Posted by: Albert '13 (why must it be 13?) on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Albert '13 (why must it be 13?) on March 22, 2009
Haha, I'm a little offended guys - I assure you, I like wide-ruled, and I'm not a slacker student. =P But I'll have a go at college-ruled next time and see how it goes!
Posted by: Janille '13 on March 22, 2009
Your story is one of the many reasons I am coming to MIT next year. There are so many paths to MIT.
Oh, and how is AT&T service in the Infinite?
Posted by: Kristina '13 on March 22, 2009
Thanks for the "MIT's not the right place for everyone " thing. Is it ok if it makes me feel better at being not being accepted?lol
Anyways, am I the only one whos getting nausea-ted because of the vertigo pictures?lol
Posted by: jimmy on March 22, 2009
My appologies
(I guess you are not a slacker if you got into MIT... congrats! I cannot wait - hopefully I get in, too...)
Posted by: Next Year =) 14? on March 22, 2009
1. Nice snap at Harvard-it's like the proverbial "insert a sharp needle into a banana" metaphor we use in my native land.
2. Please tell Blog Police to back off- and no way could Oprah, smart as she is, keep up with your mind. Her style is more Polarfleece blankie.
Jon Stewart would be more your style. Only plus with Oprah- request a layover in St Louis on the way to Chicago- free trip home!
@Jimmy
No, you are not the only one who gets nauseated. I just stare really hard till my vision blurs and i can't tell what i'm seeing- tadah! vertigo all better.
Posted by: Mom out west on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Ruth '13 on March 22, 2009
Posted by: 0 on March 22, 2009
~ Julio ('14?)
Posted by: Julio ('14?) on March 22, 2009
The math you're learning in high school, no matter how "advanced" it is, probably does not emphasize the true fundamentals. The application problems will probably require some experimentation and basic, yet sturdy, reasoning from the ground up.
@ Yan
I was recently convinced that my preschool must have skimped on the ordinal numbers when I got three "1-off" answers on the AIME. (www.maa.org)
Posted by: Hewhowasactuallysecond on March 22, 2009
In fact, in high school, I think it would be saving more trees if I were to use wide-rule paper, because that would be wide-rule paper I was using 1 sheet per assignment on that some person with GIGANTIC handwriting couldn't be wasting on whatever assignment they had to take up 5 sheets of wide-rule (hopefully less of college-rule) paper to write a single essay on.
^luckily that shouldn't apply in college (me only using 1 sheet per assignment), so I won't have to worry as much about assisting people with gigantic handwriting killing trees. Though that logic is clearly flawed, that's what I'm telling myself.
Oh, and I also officially replied to MIT's admission offer before I got my fin. aid~
Posted by: Narce on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Narce on March 22, 2009
Posted by: 0 on March 22, 2009
I can totally relate with your feelings about wide ruled paper. My writing is painfully small cursive and I use college ruled too. All of my writing assignments end up being considerably longer than my peers because of that.
I guess that idiosyncrasy endowed my intellect with a little extra push.
But anyone who is willing to take the challenge of MIT knows that any of the things that made us stand out in high school aren't good enough anymore. High school is relatively farcical. There's a whole new echelon of expectations at this institute.
Posted by: Alex '13 on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Narce on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Alex '13 on March 22, 2009
Posted by: comboy on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Ngozi '13 on March 22, 2009
@ Next Year:
Many thanks! MIT is best taken with a large dose of optimism. To be honest, I have to pry myself away from liberally tossing around the word "hosed," which is probably the centerpiece of MIT colloquialism. We'll see how that goes in the coming years.
@ Kristina:
I'm honored to hear that and sincerely hope that you find your place at MIT if you choose to come here. Not sure about AT&T service . . . hopefully someone else around MIT can answer that for you.
@ Basically everyone:
I was a staunch defendant of wide-ruled for years. It was nice for math homework in high school because I could fit fractions onto one line without using the slash notation (as in 3/4 instead of 3 over 4).
The revelation came when I had to deal with 8.022 problem sets this semester that had a ridiculous number of variables nested inside space-consuming formulas nested inside double integrals. I reached the point where it was more efficient to just use two lines of college ruled than try to cram everything into one line of wide-ruled. Also, wide ruled is incredibly annoying for vector calculus operations.
I have officially written too much about this topic.
Posted by: Yan on March 22, 2009
(...and then you can get docked points for having illegible psets...)
Posted by: ShawnOfAwesome '11 on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Yan on March 22, 2009
Hmm… that turned out to be a bit more morose than I thought it would. But don’t mind me; I’m just trying to make peace with the past.
And continuing on with that topic:
@Yan (and the other bloggers): you guys seem like great people and it makes me sad that we might never meet. I loved all the entries and wish you all well in your future endeavors.
@Everyone admitted: congrats. Admissions this year has been officially dubbed (and if not, then I just did) the “MIT Massacre” (I’m never sure if the period is supposed to go in the quote or after it so I apologize to all the English majors beforehand). A vast number of top notch candidates (…) got rejected this year and it’s your duty to do what they cannot and cherish your time at MIT. And once again: kudos.
@MIT: With a 3% admissions rate as a Canadian citizen who was born in China, raised in Germany, and currently living in Arizona, the chances of me getting here were about equal to me being affected by the tiny warning labels on retainers specifying how one in a million people might be allergic to it (sadly, there turned out to be no correlation between receiving a gum infection from this transparent torture device and getting into the greatest college/university in the world). Maybe I’ll see you during grad school?
There, I’ve made my peace and it only took 390 characters/ three text messages/ $0.15 on Virgin’s outrageous pay as you go plan.
Chances are that I won’t be posting here anymore: the logic being that one shouldn’t place a starving infant next to the greatest candy store in the world while telling him that he can’t have any of it and that he must eat spinach for the rest of his life.
Ciao
Posted by: KSL on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Steph '13 on March 22, 2009
Food in Manhattan is superrr overpriced... Even McDonalds there are more expensive than the ones in other boroughs.
I am currently a high school junior and although there is a 99% I won't get accepted into MIT and end up in some random state college, I do enjoy coming to this site, mainly because to read your blog. You probably heard this a million times already, but I guess it bears repeating that your writing skills are amazing, which is an understatement, but I can't think any better words at the moment. It is a great source of inspiration, not to mention probably the most interesting prose I ever lay my eyes upon. I have dictionary.com open just to keep up with your vocabulary (good for SATs
Now I have to finish my physics lab report -_-
P.S. In light of that 1% chance I might get accepted to MIT, I want to ask how much do extracurricular activities count for getting accepted? I fall extremely short in terms of extracurriculars, mainly because it takes me 2 hours to go to school, and another 2 to come back home, so I would be coming home at around 7 every day if I stay for teams/clubs. I do have a lot of hours of volunteering though in the summer and weekends though.
P.S.S. I prefer graph paper for math :D
Posted by: Anderson on March 22, 2009
Also Yan, do you read Terry Pratchett?
Posted by: whee on March 22, 2009
Posted by: Piper '12 on March 22, 2009
Terry Pratchett has some quotes that I severely enjoy, but his novels are a bit too much. He's like the literary equivalent of Jolly Ranchers- fun and zingy when taken in moderation, but not something that I'd want to make dinner out of.
@ Anderson:
Thanks for the compliments. I wouldn't worry about extracurriculars if I were in your situation. A good question to ask yourself is: would I be getting more out of my high school experience if I joined this club? Would this activity help me grow into a better, wiser person? Or am I just doing it so that I have something to put on a college application?
Ok, so that was technically three questions.
Anyway, it's important to remember that MIT considers you as a whole, not just as a sum of parts. Having less extracurriculars won't necessarily hurt their impression of you in any way.
Posted by: Yan on March 23, 2009
Continuing off what Yan said, if I recall correctly the application only allows for 5 activities maximum. MIT would rather see dedication to a few things than a laundry list. (Keep in mind, though, that you will probably not get in on scores alone. But it sounds like you're active anyway :D.)
Posted by: Piper '12 on March 23, 2009
Keep blogging!
Posted by: Javal on March 23, 2009
Oh, you mean I shouldn't have included "12 shirts, 10 pairs of shorts, 2 pairs of pants, and 24 socks" on my list of extracurriculars? Darnit, it is hard to differentiate between what I do for fun and what I put in the washing machine.
Posted by: ShawnOfAwesome '11 on March 23, 2009
p.s. Yan, Lex '12 says hi.
Posted by: Chris B. '12 on March 23, 2009
This is probably the most philosophical thing I have ever read on the internet. kudos.
a kajillion kudos to you for being such an incredible person with amazing insight. I really hope I get to meet you at CPW, but I am actually somewhat scared that I will be so intimidated I won't be able to muster up the nerve to talk to you. Plus, I probably wouldn't have anything entertaining or intelligent to say compared to you. Well, here's to hoping it's all good.
Posted by: Christine on March 23, 2009
Posted by: Mark (not MIT, '13) on March 23, 2009
Posted by: Sheila '13 on March 23, 2009
Posted by: Piper '12 on March 23, 2009
Awesome post!
Posted by: Lyddie on March 23, 2009
I have a friend who wrote an allegorical story about sushi in his blog revealing his college acceptances. (I think the purpose was to only make sense to the people he wanted it to make sense to). What a coincidence.
Posted by: 0 on March 23, 2009
Posted by: Anderson on March 23, 2009
Posted by: A Nony Mous on March 23, 2009
I read this great Onion article once about Mead releasing graduate student paper. The lines were approx. 14 nanometers apart or something. Way better than the college-ruled paper all those slacker undergrads use!
Posted by: Liz on March 23, 2009
I could write a blog entry about being younger than most people (but not the youngest by a long shot) in my class, but it'd be about two sentences long. Probably 90% of my friends/contacts/classmates at MIT have no idea that I dropped out of high school- mainly because it makes no difference. Everyone here learns together, regardless of what they did before coming to MIT.
Half the time, I forget that I'm a year younger than the average 2012'er. It really isn't a big deal at all.
@ Liz:
The Onion is a bastion of truth.
Posted by: Yan on March 23, 2009
I'm totally with ya there, I always fit fractions on a single line of college-ruled. If ya don't do that, you have to put parentheses around whatever's on each side of the '/', which just looks nasty.
Posted by: Narce on March 23, 2009
Posted by: Piper '12 on March 24, 2009
Nice post Yan. Where did all the food go? I love when you put food pics, always inspires me to go eat something new. See you at CPW and again nice post. Excellent writer.
Posted by: Yeyson '13 on March 24, 2009
"Do they not teach you about ordinal numbers in preschool anymore?"
-Yan
Ordinal, yes
Correct number, no
58th
Posted by: 0 on March 24, 2009
Posted by: whee on March 24, 2009
Posted by: Yeyson '13 on March 25, 2009
I hate to break it to you, but I've been deleting spam comments all along and messing up the comment numbering . . .
Posted by: Yan on March 25, 2009
Posted by: Narce on March 26, 2009
Posted by: JL on March 26, 2009
Posted by: ptynan on March 27, 2009
Comments have been closed.