Skip to content ↓
MIT student blogger Ana V. '15

Terrascope by Ana V. '15

Save the world. Go. (:

If there’s one thing I’ve learned during my first semester at MIT is that there is a difference between a bad question, a difficult question, and a rhetorical question.

If I asked you what the meaning of life was, you could answer in a multitude of ways and I wouldn’t be able to say you’re right or wrong because the question could be answered subjectively . Or you could reply by declaring that it’s unclear what I am trying to ask you. What do I mean by “meaning”? Do I mean to ask what the meaning of the word life is, or what the meaning of the meaning of the word life is? You can’t prioritize to determine whether you should answer it as life as a biological process or an experience. This is the example of the bad question that is, in essence, unanswerable.

Now, if you were a professor asking this difficult question to a group of incoming MIT freshmen for them to answer in a single semester:

“How would you effectively prioritize the biggest issues facing our planet, develop feasible scientific, social, and economic approaches to addressing them, keeping biodiversity in mind, and present it all in a convincing manner?”

Their rhetorical question-response would be: “Isn’t that like asking how I would save the world?!”

Not to mention that some of their faces would look like the picture on the left for 70% of the semester, and like the one on the right for the remaining 30%. heehee.



How can I be so sure, you ask?

The images you see above are actually visual representations of me while working in a team to attempt to answer that very question. No worries, I enjoyed every minute of time-pressured-pondering-facial-contortion. ;D

You see, I’m part of a learning community open to freshmen called Terrascope. As part of being in Terrascope, you take Solving Complex Problems (12.000) in the fall, which is, “designed to provide students the opportunity to work as part of a team to propose solutions to a complex problem that requires an interdisciplinary approach.” This fall’s class, Mission 2015, answered the difficult question above, and each year’s class has the tasks of researching a major global issue, eventually proposing a multi-faceted solution in front of a panel of experts, and compiling a website to explain the problem and solution. Previous years’ topics range “from the collapse of the global fisheries, to access to clean fresh water, to stemming the rise of greenhouse gases, to feeding nine billion people.”

The class is entirely self-taught, as students decide when to meet, what course of action to take, etc. Of course, there were Undergraduate Teaching Fellows (UTFs)* and mentors available to help us out when the going got rough and we asked for help on how to put everything together (they also helped by cooking food for our meetings [because the terrascope room has a kitchen] and give us scrumptious chocolate-covered coffee beans to keep us awake, pictured to the right). Being in Mission 2015 really made me think about the world as a complex system, and it helps me think about problems in general in a systematic and efficient fashion. With the right mindset, questions are not unphanthomable–they’re either just really difficult or simply bad.

Also, it’s pretty awesome when your  classmates decorate the board in the Terrascope room such that you could come in one day and find this.


When I asked why all the garbage was tacked onto the board, I was swiftly answered by “We’re plotting how much more food we’ve been consuming since we realized we only had a few days left until the presentation.”

I <3 MIT moment. D’aww.

In any case, even though Mission is over, the Terrascope experience can continue with two optional spring classes:

1. 1.016, Complex Environmental Issues, which takes some of the ideas that were developed in Mission in the fall and attempts to implement solutions. And…

2. Terrascope Radio (SP.360), which develops a radio show to help spread the word about the year’s topic.

I know for sure I’ll at least be taking Terrascope Radio next semester, and I can’t wait to experience what it has in store!

If you have any questions about Terrascope, leave them in a comment!

In the meantime, I shall be refraining from asking my little cousin (who was just explaining to me that aliens are going to attack the earth) why he would think karate is enough to rid the planet of aliens should they invade earth, and how he will convince everyone on the planet to learn karate given that there are so many other problems facing the world, and whether it’s even a possibility that aliens will come and invade our planet to begin with. I don’t think he’s quite ready to answer these questions, or give up the fact that karate isn’t the magic solution to ALL threatening things.

* UTFs are undergraduates who went through MIssion themselves as freshmen, and Mentors are usually graduates that were in some way involved with Terrascope. A big thank you to all of you!

9 responses to “Terrascope”

  1. Sudhanshu says:

    @Ana Personally, how do you think our Earth will look like in next 25 years?

  2. Sabina '15 says:

    :D :D :D

  3. Muneeza says:

    ahhh Ana <3

  4. Ana V. '15 says:

    @ Sudhanshu:
    well, I could spend an eternity expressing that and still not be sure I’ve answered that question.
    Do you mean in terms of biodiversity and the question Mission 2015 answered?

  5. Ashwin says:

    The meaning of life? I thought everyone knew that it was 42. wink

  6. Stephanie says:

    You know I may not have shown it on the outside, but those pictures are what I felt and looked like on the inside…ah great times. BTW, I really like this blog!

  7. Ana V. '15 says:

    @Ashwin. haha! I like.

    @Sudhanshu, Very loosely speaking, I think that the times in which the world is faced with the greatest dilemmas are the times in which the greatest opportunities arise.

    However, there is also that notion of “when will enough damage be done so that there would be no hope of ever restoring the earth.” Our class discussed this issue many times, but mostly I think it all depends on what requirements you would call ‘essential to preserving the earth’s integrity’. Earth is, as a complex system, always changing whether we humans do anything about it or not.

    Right now I would say that if the main concern was human survival, we are probably in a situation in which feasible solutions exist (like the solution our class presented). If the main concern is saving other particular species, such as the polar bear or tiger, for example, then I think things look a lot bleaker, especially considering human habits, etc.

  8. Sudhanshu says:

    I was asked this Q during the MIT interview and I said well, whatever I would answer won’t make any sense and there was a long discussion on this.
    One one end, you see, there are speculations about ever blooming technology which gives you a hope of a brighter and smarter future of our planet. On the other end is the global ecological crisis that coming generations will face and this pessimistic approach makes me doubt over the future of earth. Where do you see both these approaches crossing? Do you see this point of time as a dilemma or an opportunity for the human race?

    I have always studied both the ‘point of views’ of a on different grounds and I think Mission 2015, as you said, may have an answer to this.