Skip to content ↓
MIT student blogger Cam T. '13

Two Blogs by Cam T. '13

...for the price of one! (a.k.a. robots)

You’ve all heard what most of the other bloggers are doing for IAP, but I’ve been quiet and left you in suspense. This means that you all must be dying to hear what I’ve been up to. I expect the barrage of questions and interrogations to start pouring in any day now.

Just kidding.

However, lucky you, I’m going to tell you what I’ve been doing anyway.

I’ve been making a robot!. As the hyperlink implies, I’ve been participating in the same robotics class as Snively, this IAP.

The class is called MASlab, and is one of the few MIT courses I’ve run up against so far that is referenced by name rather than number (although for reference, the number is 6.186 — MASlab is a course 6 class, but it is also listed in courses 2 and 16, which means you can take it for EECS, Mechanical Engineering, or Aero/Astro!) MASlab stands for Mobile Autonomous Systems laboratory, which means that a bunch of college-type kids have to build a bunch of bumbling-type robots. By “bumbling”, I mean that the robots are acting entirely under their own brainpower, in a partially foreign environment. Not all robots bumble, when placed in the environment, but many do; it’s tricky to program autonomous robots.

To roughly (and hopefully, correctly) describe the competition, us student-folk have the month of IAP to design, build, and program an autonomous robot which uses a camera and numerous other, smaller sensors to navigate around a playing field. There are (up to?) 16 balls, red and yellow, on this field, and there are red and yellow goals. Robots earn points by scoring balls in red and yellow goals, with different point rewards based on color matching. The competition lasts five minutes, which is an awfully short amount of time for a month of work. To help robots navigate the playing field, the walls are white with a blue edge on top; additionally, there are “barcodes” on walls throughout the playing field which act as landmarks for robots using mapping algorithms. Processing occurs on an asus eeePC running linux, and robot control is (traditionally — some teams decide to go above and beyond) performed over the OrcBoard, which controls the motors and accesses the non-camera sensors.

Also, in case you didn’t catch it from the second to last link: maslab has a youtube channel! Snag it at .

Anywho, onto the guts of it all.

This fall, three juniors with whom I live (happy, grammarfolk?) approached me about working on their maslab team, because of my previous experience with both programming and mechanical engineering. They warned me that maslab would consume all of my time over IAP; they jokingly told me that it would take up 24 hours a day, and they weren’t far off. Since January 4th, I’ve spent most of every day working on a tiny robot that likes to wobble all over the place. We’re making quite a lot of progress, though — the robot is almost entirely constructed, and we’re debugging a large part of our vision code, with sensor and odometry modules being developed in parallel.

Check it out!

As I think I mentioned in my bio, I spent three years in high school working on a recently-blogged subject: FIRST robotics. I spent a year on MIT’s team before leaving to start a team at my high school, with three of my friends, and FIRST was hugely influential in my personal and academic development. Since maslab occurs at the same time as FIRST does, this January feels to me like the last three, except that when I go home the robots come with me. It’s been busy and it’s been crazy, but just like FIRST it feels rewarding.

I can’t bring myself to write too much more about it, though, because I’ve spent a lot of time already doing just that:

That is our team’s journal, on the maslab 2010 wiki, authored primarily by yours truly. Pretend it’s an extension to this blog post :) (Hence the title)

Also, for more on maslab, I’d especially recommend checking out maslab’s front page, and the main wiki page:

And, for your amusement, a recent test video (that’s not my voice, by the way):

Now, moving on.

As the older and crustier of you blogreaders may know, I’ve left something up in the air from fall semester: 18.022. Check my previous blog posts for more on that; in short, I miserably failed a test — getting a 36 — with one of the two lowest grades in the class (if I recall correctly), and learned a lesson or two from it. Now that fall semester’s over, I have some results for y’all.

I don’t have access to the online grading system for that class anymore, since I’m no longer enrolled (because fall semester’s over, not because of anything bad), so there’s no dramatic screenshot to present here. Long story made short: I pulled through and got a 94 on the third test, bringing my average back up to a comfortable number. It was quite the learning experience for me; it brought out a quality in me that I hadn’t had to call on in a long time. It taught me that if I just persevere and don’t give in when it feels hopeless, I can pull through. Sappy? Perhaps, but darned useful.

To jump back to the original topic of this post, though, there’s one thing I’m trying to do this IAP that I haven’t yet mentioned to you: 6.184. 6.184 is known as “caffeinated 6.001”. 6.001 (six double-oh one) was, some years ago, MIT’s introductory computer science course; it has a somewhat legendary status. As soon as I heard about it and checked out the course info (and textbook — available for free online, and highly recommended!), it was *the* course I wanted to take, even before I got to MIT. I was quite disappointed to find out some weeks after learning of its existence that it in fact existed no longer. They stopped offering the course a few years ago, and replaced it with 6.01. 6.01 (six oh one) is a course that teaches introductory EECS using a prebuilt robotics platform and the python programming language; the transition is rather well described, in my humble opinion, here. Now that 6.001 is dead and gone, though, 6.184 is a course offered over IAP that condenses a famous, semester-length class into 8 lectures and 4 projects. It’s a lot of work, a lot of confusion, and a lot of fun. And Yan’s taking it too!

I may have to drop it, though, this IAP; I barely have time to keep up with meals and laundry, as is, and I’ve been sick for the last four days. Time to rest up. But, hey, there’s always next year, right? (Unless they really use the LHC, which is a supermegaworldbomb — don’t let the rumors that it’s “for science” deceive you)

9 responses to “Two Blogs”

  1. parav says:

    Which is more cool? Lego robots(6.270) or eeePc run robots(6.186)?

  2. I’d put “FIRST!”, but I’m no longer in 2nd grade.

    Anyway, put this in application as supplement, good or bad? Yes, I know it’s late to ask, but it WOULD reduce tension….

    Observable laws and set conditions define our methods of definition in relation to Cosmological models of the universe, and by intransalistic association, the “theory of everything”, or better yet, the very notion of existence itself. Clearly seen are accepted properties such as gravity, universal expansion, relativity, and so forth; few stands are given to any aberrations from these “standards”, as they are, of course, proven.
    However, the questionable reason for origin (or its reciprocal) may coerce perusal of such unquestioned ‘absolutes.’ The in-sanstrinstic law of infinity procalates an idea: what if ANYTHING could have theoretical existed? After the big bang? Or before the big bang? Why is the universe as it is at all- a big bang 13.7 billion years ago followed by what we see today? If random trumps reason, not form should be any more expected then another. Existence could have created a non-physical universe, or a universe that hasn’t started yet (now THERE’S a mind-warping thought) or ,I suppose, ANYTHING. Existence might not have been at all. Or there might have been (or might be) more than one. This would also challenge the concept of “supernatural.” Theoretically, any verison of reality mathematically could have (and paradoxically does.) So is natural theomorphism to hard to believe?
    After the big bang, anything could have formed. Whose to say there aren’t multiverses, “superverses”, or an infinite number of scenarios?

  3. Ammar'14 says:

    Sweet! one of the most interesting posts I’ve seen in a while. Although it made me forget studying my final Chemistry exam to write up plans for when I attend 6.186, yeah I am that excited about it!
    Though in retrospect that might not be the brightest idea for me right now ^^” (especially since I have no guarantee I’m going to get admitted in the first place, but hey the materials are available right ? I can still do it if I got rejected, wouldn’t be as exciting but still, when did I let that stop me?). I wish we had something like FIRST at high-school *sigh*.

    Asus eeePCs are a nice idea here, good processing power and easier to work with, but are they provided by the institute ?

    6.001 sure looks awesome, but 6.01 looks interesting as well, and hey it’s Python! You know what that means? now you can use:

    import antigravity

    So you no longer need to deal with walls and obstacles in the robot’s track!

    btw, perhaps they’re planning to unleash the LHC supermegaworldbomb in 2012? that way both conspiracy and Doomsday theorists will be happy! (will they really ?)

    I’d go with “eeePc run robots (6.186)”

    P.S: my captcha on this post : Athnena …

  4. Anonymous says:

    @ Cam
    I’m in a similar condition with my maths. Only difference is I’m ending high school soon (Indian syllabus)….
    Any suggestions on what you did to get out of the 18.022 score slump??
    Enjoy IAP! -:D

  5. Vaibhav says:

    @ Cam
    I’m Vaibhav by the way! I dunno why my name came as anonymous in the last comment…..

  6. Text “HAITI” to 90999 to donate $10 to Red Cross relief.

    Thank you

  7. D says:

    Cool stuff. I love the opportunities that MIT (and the American education system in general) gives. Its one of the reasons I applied. In my country, they do not just come knocking at your door. Research and projects are for researchers, not students. I sure hope I get in.

  8. Barrilito says:

    Que hay wee, ps qdó chido tu trabajo, como le hiciste?

    Un favor wee, no seas mamón y agamos un intercambio, t conviene wee, piénsalo y luego me escribes al correo q t dejé.

    Al reto, te bañas, y por cierto échale ganas a la vida.

  9. This is what makes MIT so unique and innovative. Almost every other school has a semester/quarter calendar; they do not have anything like IAP. MIT students can explore any talent or interest without the burdens of classes or homework.